Rethinking City Traffic

B2 (Upper-Intermediate)Reading

Rethinking City Traffic

A B2 text about urban transport and induced demand. Practise understanding counter-intuitive arguments and inference.

Cities around the world are facing a common challenge: how to move growing populations efficiently without choking on traffic and pollution. For decades, the default solution was to build more roads. Paradoxically, however, research has repeatedly shown that adding road capacity often fails to reduce congestion, because the extra space simply encourages more people to drive—a phenomenon known as “induced demand”.

In response, many forward-thinking cities have changed direction. Rather than prioritising cars, they have invested heavily in public transport, cycling lanes and pedestrian zones. Some have even introduced charges for driving into the city centre. While such measures are sometimes unpopular at first, they have frequently led to cleaner air, quieter streets and, surprisingly, more profitable local businesses.

The lesson is counter-intuitive but powerful: the key to better urban mobility may not lie in accommodating more cars, but in giving people attractive alternatives to using them.

Check your understanding

Answer the questions below. You will see instantly if you are right.

1.What was the traditional solution to traffic?
For decades the default solution was to build more roads.
2.What is "induced demand"?
It is when adding road capacity encourages more driving, not less.
3.What have forward-thinking cities invested in?
They invested in public transport, cycling lanes and pedestrian zones.
4.What surprising effect did these measures have on businesses?
Surprisingly, local businesses became more profitable.
5.What does the writer mean by "counter-intuitive"?
Counter-intuitive means contrary to what common sense suggests.

Want feedback from a real tutor on your reading, writing and speaking?

Book a Free Consultation
Scroll to Top